VIRGINIA MOTORCYCLING ARTICLES
  INDEX
Title
1; Beware. Your GPS may be spying on you
2; Do not be Denied Access in Virginia
3; Do Not Make a Statement at the Scene of an Accident
4; Protection for You and Your Rider
5; What is Your Bike Worth - Probably Less Than You Think
6; You are not violating Virginia law if you ride with a Non-DOT Helmet
7; The Fight for the Rights of Motorcyclists is about more than Helmets


  1; Beware. Your GPS may be spying on you

Beware. Your GPS may be collecting evidence against you. More and more motorcyclists today are using GPS (Global Positioning Systems) to plan trips, get directions, and keep track of miles traveled. However, keep in mind that, if you are in an accident, you may be collecting evidence that could be used against you in both a criminal and civil trial.

Many systems allow you to keep track of your speed. We at the law offices of Tom McGrath have come across jurisdictions which, at the scene of an accident when speed is a question, will seize a crash victim's GPS, get a search warrant, and download the information pertaining to speed. As a matter of fact, that was currently done in federal court in a case along the Blue Ridge Parkway when a park ranger pulled in front of a motorcyclist whom the parkway ranger later claimed was speeding. That case is still in litigation.

Such action does more than subject the crash victim to a speeding ticket. It can, if the injured party was speeding, put their ability to collect damages for their injuries at risk. Virginia is a contributory negligence state. That means that if the party who injured you can show that you were in some way at fault in causing the accident, then your claim can be denied. Speed can be used as a contributing factor to deny an injury claim, even if the other party is more at fault than you.

Now keep in mind that I am in no way suggesting that you should not use a GPS on your motorcycle. I am merely suggesting that if you do, keep in mind that, depending on the system and how you use it, you could be collecting evidence that could eventually be used by the party that injures you to avoid paying for the injuries that they caused.

If you have any further questions or comments concerning this article or any other matters concerning your rights as a motorcyclist in Virginia, please contact me at 1-800-321-8968 or at
matt@tommcgrathlaw.com

The preceding is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. The laws governing the above may be different in your state.



Back to menu
  2; Do not be Denied Access in Virginia

Have you ever attempted to park in a public parking lot or parking garage and been faced with a sign reading in whole or in part that motorcycles are not allowed? Have you ever attempted to use any roadway to enter any public property only to find out that motorcycles may not enter the property? If you have then the locality which is restricting you access merely because you are on a motorcycle is breaking the law.

Section 33.1-13.1 of the Code of Virginia, prohibits the imposition of any requirement of which the principal purpose is to restrict or inhibit the access of motorcycles and motorcyclists to any highway, bridge, tunnel, or other transportation facility. This provision applies to any roads or transportation facility undertaken or operated by counties, cities, towns and other political subdivisions of the Commonwealth where public funds have been used in whole or in part to plan, design, construct, equip, operate, or maintain the facility. For the purposes of state law a parking garage or parking lot is a transportation facility.

This issue has arisen several times over the last year. This past summer my wife and I were visiting Williamsburg with our two children. We were in our SUV (I apologize for that) waiting to park in the Prince George Street parking garage. Ahead of us was a motorcyclist attempting to enter the garage. It seemed to be taking longer than it should have so I rolled down my window to see why. At that point I heard the attendant say that motorcycles were not allowed in the garage. I could see my wife wince (she knew what was coming) as I exited the car. I found from the attendant that the garage is owned and operated by the City of Williamsburg. The very next Monday a letter went out to the city informing them of the law in Virginia. Within 30 days, that garage was opened to motorcycles. Unfortunately, the issue has now arisen in Big Stone Gap Virginia. The town operates a cemetery. The town does not allow motorcycles to enter the roadways of the cemetery. A letter went out last week and we will see what happens next.

The bottom line is that if the state, or any city county or town uses public money to build, maintain or operate any roadway or transportation facility, they cannot keep motorcycles from using them. We as motorcyclists pay taxes which fund these projects. We should not be told that we can't use them.

I would encourage any motorcyclist who sees any situation similar to the ones described in this article to let the owners know that they are breaking the law. If that does not correct the situation, feel free to give my office a call. We don't charge a dime to enforce this statute. We as motorcyclists have the same stake in protecting equal access to public property as you do, and we will be more than happy to help. If you have any further questions or comments concerning this article or any other matters concerning your rights as a motorcyclist in Virginia, please contact me at 1-800-321-8968 or at
matt@tommcgrathlaw.com

The preceding is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. The laws governing the above may be different in your state.



Back to menu
  3; Do Not Make a Statement at the Scene of an Accident

I travel around the state speaking to motorcycle clubs and organizations about matters involving motorcyclists such as insurance, statutes involving motorcycling, and what to do if you are involved in an accident. In speaking to people, the one thing that always raises eyebrows is when I tell people not to make a statement at the scene of an accident; not even to the police. I often get responses such as "don't I have to make a statement to the police?" and "why shouldn't I? I have nothing to hide." The answer to those questions is you don't have to speak to the police, and your statement at the scene of an accident may not be accurate, and may cost you any case you may have.

Please keep in mind that I am not anti-law enforcement. I am a former police officer and a former prosecuting attorney. I was in law enforcement for nearly 12 years. However, I am also pro accident victim and I do not want you, if you are an accident victim, to mistakenly hurt your claim.

As I have stated before Virginia is a contributory negligence state. That means that if the party who injured you can show that you were in some way at fault in causing the accident, then your claim can be denied. Speed, following to close, and not paying attention can be used as contributing factors to deny an injury claim, even if the other party is more at fault than you. In other words, if you are struck in a 35 mile per hour zone and you state you were going between 35 and 40 mph, that can put your claim in jeopardy. Most people are not looking at their speedometer at impact. Therefore, most people guess at their speed. Don't do that? At the scene of an accident, your adrenaline is pumping, you may be in pain, and you may be angry. This is no time to make a statement. You may not be accurate, and the insurance company will rely on that statement to evaluate your case. What you should say to the officer is that you are in no condition to make a statement at this time and that you just want to get to the hospital to get checked out. You can make a statement at a later date, after you have had time to calm down and reflect.

By way of example, I was in an auto accident a couple years ago. I was making a left at a solid green light when I was t-boned by another driver. My first thought was that he was at fault. If I had a solid green the other driver, who was traveling straight, must have had one as well. Needless to say I was very angry at myself. However, I remembered the advice I gives to others and refrained from making a statement. The next day, a witness to the accident, who had given me her number, told me that she saw the accident and was on the same side of intersection as the person who hit me. She stated that the light was green as I entered the intersection; however that it had immediately turned yellow. All of the traffic was coming to a stop when she heard a vehicle rapidly accelerating trying to beat the light. The light went red as I was in the intersection and as the rapidly accelerating vehicle entered the intersection and struck my vehicle. Based on that statement, the other party's company accepted liability and paid all damages from the accident. Had I made a statement at the scene I would have been wrong and I would have destroyed my case.

If you find yourself in an accident make sure to do the following: First; get medical attention just to make sure you are ok. Second; do not make a statement to the police or to any insurance company. Let the police know that you will speak to them later after you have calmed down and sought medical attention. Third; contact an attorney. There is a very good chance you won't need the help of an attorney, but its better to make sure before proceeding with your matter further. This usually does not cost you any money. My firm for instance will talk to anyone about their accident at no charge. I would rather you contact me and not need me then unknowingly need legal assistance and not realize it until after you have hurt yourself.

If you have any further questions or comments concerning this article or any other matters concerning your rights as a motorcyclist in Virginia, please contact me at 1-800-321-8968 or at
matt@tommcgrathlaw.com

The preceding is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. The laws governing the above may be different in your state.



Back to menu
  4; Protection for You and Your Rider

By J. Thomas McGrath, Attorney

You put on your leathers. You put on your boots. You put on your gloves. You put on your helmet. You check your bike. You crank it. You look both ways. You pull away from the curb. You go down the road thinking how wonderful it is to ride a motorcycle. You've done all the right things. You're wearing all the right equipment. You're taking all the precautions you know you have to take to feel safe. You know there is always the possibility that someone might not see you and cause a crash, but this doesn't worry you because you know they have insurance.

So, you feel like you're pretty safe: but are you? Over eighty percent of motorcycle accidents are the fault of the automobile driver. In most cases, the automobile driver has insurance, but is it going to be enough? In other words, are you going to be adequately covered by what someone else has purchased to protect you? Aren't we all subject to the same advertising that tells us to save money on our car insurance? When your agent sells you a policy with Virginia minimum limits of $25,000, do you stop to think, is this going to be enough to cover someone I injure? You don't think you're going to injure anyone. Instead, you look at the dollars and go for the lowest price. In doing this you are selling yourself short. You are not protecting yourself. Let me explain.

In Virginia, the amount of liability insurance you purchase to protect someone you accidentally injure is the same amount of uninsured/underinsured motorist protection that you get. This is the cardinal rule to remember. This is automatic. This is true on each motor vehicle (car, truck, motorcycle) liability insurance policy you purchase, unless you specifically reject this coverage in writing. Why is this important? This is important because this is the way you are going to protect yourself. Let's go back to where you were on your bike; you are going down the street and someone pulls out in front of you causing a collision. He didn't see you. You're laid up in the hospital and you've got a fractured femur, you've got a good health insurance plan and that health insurance plan will pay your medical bills. Let's go one step further and say you have a good employer and you have a lot of sick leave so you are going to continue to receive your wages.

Your femur injury is going to require an internal fixation. They have to operate and put your leg back together and they bolt it and screw it and they put some internal pins in there and keep the whole thing wired up and its going to take you about six months or more before you're able to walk without crutches and you're going to have some permanent disability. The guy who hit you had $25,000 of coverage, the Virginia minimum limit, what the law says each car has to have. Your medical bills are going to run around $40,000 to $50,000, but this is covered by your medical insurance; you've lost six months of work and you've had to use your leave time. All you're going to recover is $25,000.

Is this going to be enough? Is this going to be fair for what you've been through? Is this a fair amount? Let's suppose you don't have an employer who is going to pay you while you're out, so you've lost $10,000 in wages. Let's assume also, that you don't have medical insurance or what you have doesn't pay all the bills. $25,000 insurance certainly is not going to be enough to pay your bills and compensate you for what you've been through.

Is there a solution to this problem? Indeed there is. The answer is purchasing higher limits of liability insurance. Remember the rule: "The more liability insurance you have, the more uninsured/underinsured motorist protection you get." How will my uninsured/underinsured motorist protection make a difference? Here's how it works in Virginia.

If you have a $100,000 liability insurance policy with $100,000 uninsured/underinsured motorist protection and the person who causes the wreck has a $25,000 liability policy, once his company has offered its $25,000, you are eligible to receive from your company up to $75,000 under the underinsured motorist provision of your policy. Your company has charged you a premium for this protection!

I am frequently asked if the increased coverage is going to cost a lot of money. No! If you have a good driving record, the average premium charge for an increase from $25,000 to $100,000 of liability insurance on your auto policy is roughly $20 to $25 every six months, (less than the cost of an oil change) and the increased premium on your uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage is about $2. Notice, I said on an automobile policy, that's where you want the additional coverage. Why, you ask, would I put it on my automobile? Simple . . . it is less expensive to increase your coverage on an automobile than it is on a motorcycle. Motorcycle insurance premiums are higher than auto insurance premiums. So, add it to your car insurance. My advice is, buy all the liability coverage you can on your car, $300,000, $500,000, whatever; you'll automatically get the additional uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage for a few dollars.

Liability coverage of $500,000 costs about $372.00 per year. A typical premium for uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage of $500,000 costs $56.00 a year. What does this have to do with a motorcycle? Plenty, in Virginia, your car policy uninsured/underinsured coverage is also available to you even if you wreck on a motorcycle provided the wreck is the fault of the other person. The better news is it is also available for any member of your family who lives with you. So, by increasing your liability coverage you can get this additional uninsured/underinsured protection for your family as well as yourself.

Hey, here's some more good news, if you have more than one motor vehicle policy in your household, you get to add them together. For example . . . If you have a policy on your car which has $100,000 of liability and $100,000 uninsured/underinsured motorist protection and a policy on your motorcycle of $25,000 of liability and $25,000 uninsured/underinsured motorist protection, you have available $125,000 of uninsured/ underinsured protection. Here's an example of how it works: Joe Blow pulled out in front of you, you struck his car, he had $25,000 of coverage and you only had $25,000 on your motorcycle, but you had $100,000 uninsured/underinsured protection on your car. Since you are insured under both policies, you get to add these policies together to determine the amount of coverage available to you. You have available $125,000 because Virginia allows you to stack or add together separate policies of motor vehicle liability insurance in the same household owned by family members to determine the available uninsured/underinsured coverage. Once his company offers its $25,000, you are eligible to recoup $100,000 from your underinsurance protection. If he had no insurance, then you have available $125,000 of uninsured motorist protection. You may be eligible to receive compensation from all the other policies in your household also.

Why not call your agent and take care of your number one priority. . You.

Obtaining proper compensation for your injuries can be complicated, so you need an attorney if you are injured. However, to purchase additional protection for you and your family, you only need the ability to speak with your agent. Find out what it will cost to increase your liability coverage on your automobile and on your motorcycle. Once you've purchased the higher liability limits and thus increased your uninsured/underinsured coverage, you'll congratulate yourself for being so smart by protecting yourself and your loved ones. Questions: Please call 1-800-321-8968

© 1997

The preceding is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. Before attempting to settle any claim you should contact an attorney. The rules governing insurance coverage may be different in your state.
 



Back to menu
  5; What is Your Bike Worth - Probably Less Than You Think

We as motorcyclists are a different breed. For most of us our motorcycles are more than a mode of transportation. They are more like treasured art which we have over time modified and created to make unique to us. When someone damages or destroys the precious object in an accident, to us, they have damaged or destroyed a priceless artifact, not just damaged a motor vehicle. However, to the insurance companies, our motorcycles are merely motor vehicles which carry a fair market value just as any other motor vehicle does. Unless you have protected your bike, if it is totaled in an accident, all you will receive is fair market value, regardless of how much you owe on it or how much you think it is worth.

Fair market value is the amount that the motorcycle would sell for on the open market. Not to be confused with what you would ask for if you were to sell it. The insurance companies will look to the NADA many times to gauge the value of a motorcycle. They will also look at what similar motorcycles are selling for in your geographic area. I often get complaints that the insurance company is not taking into consideration items such as chrome or exhaust in computing a value. Keep in mind that fair market value is not computed by adding up all that you have invested in the motorcycle. If you add $2,000 worth of chrome to your bike that does not necessarily mean the bike is worth $2,000 more than before you added it. The question is, can I as a buyer go out and purchase another bike like it for less. The answer is often yes. You can go on Cycle Trader or eBay and find a plethora of motorcycles chromed to the hilt being sold for much less than you would sell it for. In fact, Jim Cannon, who is with our firm, tracks what motorcycles are selling for on sites such as EBay in order to be able to better articulate to an insurance company why a motorcycle is worth more than they are offering. That is why I tell clients that if they want to put chrome on their motorcycle, do it because you like the chrome, not because you want to add value to your bike. I also advise that they save their receipts. While you can't always get the full value of what you invested, you can sometimes get more by documenting what you have invested, depending on what was added and when it was added.

So what can you do to protect your bike? Other than what I advised above, you can purchase gap insurance. Now do not be confused. Gap insurance does not mean that you get replacement value for your motorcycle. What gap insurance does is pay the difference of what the motorcycle is worth, and what you owe. It keeps you from being "upside down" in your loan. By way of example, let's say you buy a bike for $15,000. One year down the road you owe $13,500 but the fair market value is now $11,000. You are in an accident and your bike is totaled. The insurance company is going to pay you $11,000. That means that you will still owe $2,500 on a motorcycle that you do not have any more. Trust me; those are painful payments to make. However, if you bought gap insurance, that would make up that $2,500 difference so that you would not find yourself owing further on the bike.

You can also insure your motorcycle for a certain amount, often called scheduled value. What that means is that if your bike is totaled, the insurance company will pay that pre-set amount. Take that $15,000 bike that you bought in the previous scenario. You schedule the bike at $15,000. The same year goes down the road and it is worth $11,000. If you are in an accident and the bike can be fixed, then the insurance company will pay to have it fixed (they have to put in the same condition it was before the accident). However, if it is totaled, they will pay you $15,000.

The bottom line is that the vast majority of us are riding with what is called an "actual cash value" policy (ACV). If our motorcycle is totaled, we will get the actual cash value of that motorcycle. If you, as many of us do, see your motorcycle as something that you have a personal investment in and you want to protect that investment, then you need to make sure that you purchase more than an ACV policy. Otherwise, your investment is at mercy of free market; and the free market will almost always determine that your motorcycle is worth less than you think it is.

If you have any further questions or comments concerning this article or any other matters concerning your rights as a motorcyclist in Virginia, please contact me at 1-800-321-8968 or at
matt@tommcgrathlaw.com

The preceding is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. The laws governing the above may be different in your state.



Back to menu
  6; You are not violating Virginia law if you ride with a Non-DOT Helmet

I am frequently asked by riders what to do if they are stopped for wearing an "illegal helmet." By illegal they always mean that the helmet is not DOT certified. My answer is always the same. Your helmet is perfectly legal in Virginia.

However, before I explain why your helmet is perfectly legal, let me say that this is not an article taking one side or the other on the great helmet debate that rages throughout the motorcycling community. Motorcyclists differ in their opinions on which type of helmet a rider should wear, and even whether or not a motorcyclist should be able to ride without a helmet at all. This article is not meant to take a position with regard to either of those debates. It is merely an attempt to clarify the applicable law in Virginia as it pertains to helmets so that each rider can make their own decision, and so that if you are stopped and ticketed for an illegal (or more often improper) helmet, you will be armed with the information to avoid paying a ticket for a violation that you did not commit.

Section 46.2-910 of the Code of Virginia requires that every operator and passenger on a motorcycle being operated on the highways of Virginia (highways includes all areas open to the public for motor vehicle travel) must wear a protective helmet. The helmet must meet or exceed any one of three helmet standards; 1) Department of Transportation (DOT), 2) Snell Memorial Foundation, or 3) The American National Standards Institute (ANSI). That's it. That is the totality of the requirements for a motorcycle helmet to meet Virginia code. Notice that the statute says that the helmet must meet or exceed any one of those standards. It does not say it must be approved by any of those entities, nor does the statute require that the helmet be marked, labeled, or certified by any of those entities. Therefore, the mere fact that your helmet does not have a sticker on it does not render it illegal, nor does it give an officer the right to pull you over or ticket you. However, if one does, do not argue, be polite and take the ticket. This is a battle to fight in court, not on the side of the road.

In order to be convicted of a helmet offense (short of not wearing one at all) the state is going to have to show that your helmet does not meet or exceed each of the above standards, which differ from one another. That means that the officer will have to know and understand each of the above standards. That is not going to happen. The standards are performance standards; they are not a guideline on how to build a helmet. The DOT and Snell standards can be obtained online, however, I cannot find anyone who has been able to find the ANSI standards. Even if they could, they are performance standards as well. What that means is that the state cannot prove its case. Often an officer will testify that he could tell that the helmet is illegal due to the weight of the helmet or the thickness of the liner. However, none of the three applicable standards dictate any certain weight for the helmet, nor do they require any particular thickness for the lining. They are silent on those issues. The standards focus on how the helmet distributes the force of an impact. There is only one way to determine that, and that is to have the helmet tested. There are three problems with that. The first is that there are no testing facilities in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The second is that the procedure necessitates destroying the helmet. The third is that the police do not have the right to take the helmet for testing in the first place without probable cause that it does not meet any of those three standards. Unless they know and understand those standards, the requisite probable cause does not exist.

In short, section 46.2-910 of the Code of Virginia is a very vague statute when it comes to mandating the types of helmets which may be worn in Virginia. In fact, two jurisdictions in Virginia, Rockingham County and the City of Newport News, have declared 46.2-910 so vague that it is unconstitutional in terms of enforcing any type of helmet which may be worn. We are expecting a third jurisdiction, Radford, to give an opinion on the matter within a month.

So the next time someone suggests that your helmet is illegal because it is not DOT certified, point them to Section 46.2-910. You could also point to the fact that their helmet is not DOT certified either given the fact that DOT does not certify helmets, but that is an issue we can tackle in the future. Once again let me say that I am not advocating any particular helmet. I am advocating knowing the laws of your state and what your rights are as a Virginia Motorcyclist.

If you have any further questions or comments concerning this article or any other matters concerning your rights as a motorcyclist in Virginia, please contact me at 1-800-321-8968 or at
matt@tommcgrathlaw.com

The preceding is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal advice. The laws governing the above may be different in your state.



Back to menu
  7; The Fight for the Rights of Motorcyclists is about more than Helmets

Every January when the Virginia General Assembly meets, motorcyclists around the state begin talking about the laws being considered that affect motorcyclists in Virginia. For many, that means the dreaded helmet statute. On this issue, motorcyclists are deeply divided. Many firmly believe that they should have the right to choose for themselves whether or not to wear a helmet. Others firmly believe that it is an important law that needs to remain in effect. Many helmet law opponents view those who wish the law to stay in place as nannies that are violating their right to choose, while helmet law supporters look at the other side as reckless and irresponsible. However both sides share a common misconception that is shared by many members of the General Assembly and the public at large; and that is that the term motorcyclist's rights is a euphemism for helmet reform. For that reason many motorcyclists do not become involved in legislative efforts to better motorcycling. For helmet reform supporters, they fail to get involved due to being discouraged over years of perceived failure. For helmet law supporters, their failure to become involved is due to their desire to see the law remain in place. Both sides are wrong. The fight for the rights of motorcyclists is about much more than helmets, and in Virginia, it is an ongoing fight that is that has seen some disappointments, but has also seen many victories that have benefited all motorcyclists in the commonwealth.

Over the years, the Virginia Coalition of Motorcyclists, with the help of other motorcyclist's rights organizations, motorcycle clubs, and individual motorcyclists, have facilitated significant changes to laws affecting motorcycling in Virginia. None of these changes have had a thing to do with helmets. Among these accomplishments are the following:

 

  • Opening up the HOV lanes to motorcycles.
  • Mandating the marking of steel plates which are used in roadway construction and constitute a danger to motorcyclists who are unaware of them until they find themselves on a wet piece of steel
  • Changing the statute governing motorcycle learners permits to make it comparable to that of automobile drivers.
  • Gaining funding for the Virginia Rider Training Program
  • The establishment of a motorcycle seat (currently held by Tom McGrath) on the Commonwealth Transportation Safety Board
  • Assisted in the establishment of the Governors Motorcycle Advisory Counsel
  • Eliminating the handlebar height restriction
  • Promulgating Section 33.1-13.1 of the Code of Virginia which prohibits the imposition of any requirement of which restricts the access of motorcycles and motorcyclists to any highway, bridge, tunnel, or other transportation facility.
  • Adding motorcycle awareness to the high school drivers education curriculum
  • Amending state code to allow motorcyclists to use headsets for communication purposes.
  • Successfully eliminating numerous proposed pieces of legislation which would have been detrimental to Virginia motorcyclists


These are but a few of the accomplishments in the Virginia motorcyclist's rights front. Every motorcyclist in Virginia has benefited from these accomplishments regardless of their stance on helmets. However, none of these would have been possible without the help of individual riders who were willing to roll up their sleeves for the betterment of Virginia motorcycling.

I would invite every motorcyclist to become involved in protecting our chosen sport, activity, passion, or any other word you may use to describe your own two wheeled addiction. Spend a day pounding yard signs for candidates who share your views on the subject or become involved in a SMRO (State Motorcycle Right Organization). There are numerous ways to become involved, as there are numerous excuses not to. However, one excuse that does not fly is that motorcyclist's rights means helmet reform. In Virginia it has never been just about helmets and it never will be. It is about protecting our rights, and improving motorcycling for our enjoyment, and for the enjoyment of those down the road.

If you have any further questions or comments concerning this article or any other matters concerning your rights as a motorcyclist in Virginia, please contact me at 1-800-321-8968 or at
matt@tommcgrathlaw.com
 



Back to menu